Google and Amazon are reportedly letting authorities use the camera footage of their customers without a warrant.
Both companies are reportedly allowing law enforcement agencies to collect data and footage without a subpoena or a warrant of arrest as long as they claim that the situation is an emergency.
Google's privacy policy is similar to Amazon's in that law enforcement can access data from its Nest products without a warrant.
Google claims it hasn't made use of this ability. Amazon has admitted to having done so about a dozen times already this year.
On the other hand, smart home cameras from brands like Anker, Wyze, Apple, Arlo, and the parent company of Eufy confirmed that they do not have the same policies as the two companies.
These companies will only provide authorities with access to the smart home camera footage if the authorities provide legal documents such as a warrant or court order.
Smart Home Camera Footage
According to Google and Amazon's information request policies for the United States, authorities must provide a warrant, subpoena, or equivalent court order before they will allow data to be obtained in most situations.
That privacy policy is not exclusive to both companies; it also applies to Wyze, Apple, Arlo, and Anker, which all have similar policies, since breaching that privacy policy is like breaching the law.
However, the threat is that Google and Amazon can make exceptions if law enforcement submits an emergency data request.
While their policies appear to be similar, it appears that the two companies respond to such requests at vastly different speeds.
According to The Verge, Kimberly Taylor, a spokesperson for Google, stated, "To date, we have never done this, but it's important that we reserve the right to do so."
Taylor claims that, despite Google's policy, they take emergency cases seriously and deploy teams and strict policies to ensure that they only provide the data necessary to assist emergency response in an ongoing threat.
If they have a reasonable belief that they can save someone from dying or suffering serious physical injury, they may give information to the authorities.
Some of the considered cases are in the event of a kidnapping, school shooting, bomb threat, missing person, or suicide prevention.
Privacy of Smart Home Cameras
As reported by CNET, during times of emergency, Google, Amazon, and other companies that handle smart home camera footage have a legal basis for making warrantless disclosures without first obtaining the user's agreement.
On the other hand, it is up to them to choose whether or not to comply with the request made by the authorities in that situation.
In its terms of service, Google specifies its emergency sharing rules. However, the text does not make it obvious that these cases include situations in which footage may be provided even in the absence of a subpoena, warrant, or court order ordering Google to do so.
The terms and privacy policies provided by companies might vary a lot and can sometimes be vague, but users can opt to choose a smart camera that offers solutions that use end-to-end encryption if their main concern is privacy.
Apple's HomeKit Secure Video protocol is a smart camera that has this setting on by default.
Regardless of the company from which a smart camera is purchased, users' digital footprints are always vulnerable to subpoena, and law enforcement is always subject to police requests for access to them.
